Linda McMahon's Connecticut Cluster?
Duke of Marlborough |
And before proceeding, this is a perfect opportunity to remind readers that this little crisis is not one of any particular group or individual Republican activist's making, The Tea Party's making, The King's making, or even Chairman Jerry Labriola's making (fact be told the McMahon camp has refused to acknowledge Labriola's existence since he tried to run an impartial State Convention earlier this year), but rather this nightmare is both owned and perpetrated by Linda McMahon and her desperate Campaign Team which unleashed a video that targets demographically-specific Obama supporters on her behalf while throwing Mitt Romney under the bus.
The King's View received an email which was distributed, and re-distributed widely to constituents - all over the state - and even to a few select individuals in the media. The pathetic action underscores the incredibly self-serving nature of the McMahon Campaign. Moreover, it implies a possibly illegal cross-coordination of federal campaign activity which doesn't make a shred of sense because it assumes there would be no loses in her dwindling base support as a trade off for assumed independent voter gains.
Here is the communication, as written (with errors), sans author's name:
Subject: Linda Mcmahon's Ad Courting Independent Voters
Hello all,
I
have received several calls about Linda's latest ad regarding her spot
on the Independent line and that she can "work with President Obama". I
called the McMahon campaign headquarters and spoke to them about this.
The response I got was that it was a stratigic move, coordinated with
the Romney campaign, to court the urban vote. They claimed that the
Romney campaign has written off Connecticut, which is probably true, and
that this is an effort to pick up some urban voters who would be voting
for Obama and may add Linda to their ballot with her being on the same
independent line.
I
can understand the strategy, but I will admit that this approach sticks
in my craw! If you want to convey your thoughts to Linda's campaign
headquarters please feel free to call her office in North Haven.
McMahon Campaign Headquarters
556 Washington Ave.
North Haven, CT 06473
P: 203-691-8592
Again, is it a smart move? Maybe politically....but it is one that may turn off a number of Republican voters. Hopefully it will not turn off Republicans enough to vote for Chris Murphy, but perhaps enough to leave that column blank out of principle.
556 Washington Ave.
North Haven, CT 06473
P: 203-691-8592
Again, is it a smart move? Maybe politically....but it is one that may turn off a number of Republican voters. Hopefully it will not turn off Republicans enough to vote for Chris Murphy, but perhaps enough to leave that column blank out of principle.
(End Communication)
Analysis:
First, it's The King's view is that it's highly unlikely that the Romney camp would ever agree to any strategy that would expose weakness of their candidate via any medium, let alone give approval for the distribution of a televised cross-endorsement of their opponent for the sake of electing a Senate candidate (particularly, the one in question). Second, and more important, it would be a violation of Federal Election Law to coordinate communication between two federal candidates unless specifically identified, and this includes the filing of required legal paperwork, and inclusion of appropriate disclaimers. The risk on both fronts wouldn't be worth the exposure. It's more apt to be another fairy-tale from the McMahon Campaign. Or another expendable McMahon Staffer simply overreaching their perceived accountability (we all remember at least one loud Communication Director who became drunk and obnoxious in Hartford, and was subsequently removed weeks later).
It's widely understood that the Romney Campaign has been contacted regarding both the McMahon Television Ad and the email distributed above. At this point, the Romney campaign is still working to determine an appropriate response to what has been referred to by some Washington Republican insiders as "The Connecticut Cluster---k". Oh, how charming! Thanks, Linda!
As to the author's reference to a "craw" and what that is... well, I don't know. But to the question as to whether this is a smart move? If the anger and outrage of the Connecticut Republican base is any indication, you would have to agree that so far, the McMahon-Obama strategy is a flop. It's The King's only hope that Linda hasn't upset the party faithful to the point where other Federal and State Republican candidates suffer on Election Day because of her selfish motives.
Developing...
I AM
THE KING
This original blog entry can be found at
http://www.thekingsview.blogspot.com/
Disclaimer: This entry and others will be modified/updated at a future date. All entries are for the sole purpose of entertainment. This article does not imply endorsement of the candidate mentioned above, nor has this article been solicited for publication by any political candidate, campaign, or PAC.
Disclaimer: This entry and others will be modified/updated at a future date. All entries are for the sole purpose of entertainment. This article does not imply endorsement of the candidate mentioned above, nor has this article been solicited for publication by any political candidate, campaign, or PAC.
4 comments:
For one, I plan on holding my nose and voting for Linda. Any more liberals in DC, and we'll all have to buy an island to survive.
As for this political strategy, it's downright dumb. With all the issues that independents fuss over (like the scam of "protecting womens wages and birth control"), McMahon's camp could have chosen one of many of them to use in their ad.
And, I'm with you, King: no way that Romney's campaign endorsed this kind of idiotic pandering to the very guy he is fighting to defeat. What a joke!
Today's Q-Polls was a big Debbie Downer for the McMahon camp showing Chris Murphy by 6 points. I thought she has all the smartest people on board.
http://soundfxnow.com/sound-fx/debbie-downer-horn/
I want to see the official correspondence from Romney and The Senate stating CT was a lost cause and it's ok to throw Republicans under the bus.
King,
Are you aware of the "Duke of Marlborough's" second email?
I have read the subsequent email from "The Duke" and many other email strings of anger and discontent. There is little news in the second email so it wasn't worth publishing. The real news will be delivered soon.
THE KING
Post a Comment